Macroinvertebrate Field Survey

 

Text Box: Grade Level:
6-8

Subject Areas:
Mathematics
Numbers, Number Sense and
Computation
Data Analysis
Mathematical
Communication
Mathematical    Reasoning
Science
  Natural Resources
  Ecosystems
  Process Skills

Duration:
60 minutes

Setting:
Field or Classroom/Lab

Link to Washoe County School District Standards:
 6.8.5
 8.8.2
 8.7.7
 9.9.1
 9.8.2
 9.8.3
 9.8.4
 15.8.2
 15.8.3
 17.8.3
 19.7.3




Purpose:  This field exercise will introduce students to a method for using macroinvertebrates as indicators of stream quality.

 

Summary:  The students will sort macroinvertebrate samples to determine relative quantities of various organisms and make an assessment of the general stream water quality.

 

Background:  Benthic macroinvertebrates can be used as indicator species to reveal information about the general water quality of a stream or river.  See "Macroinvertebrate Clues" for more information.

 

Macroinvertebrates vary in their tolerance to pollution levels.  Usually the pollution is from excess nutrients or sediments that cause low oxygen levels.  Generally, mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies have the lowest tolerance to pollution, while midges, leeches, worms, and blackflies have the highest.  In the middle, "somewhat tolerant" range are crustaceans, beetles, and craneflies.

 

In most streams and rivers, the larval insects will tend to dominate the macroinvertebrate community.  These organisms cannot move far from their immediate habitat, and thus must adjust to changes in water quality, including the food that's available to them, the kind of stream bottom, predators, the temperature, and the speed of the water.  For this reason, these organisms are good indicators of what has happened in the stream during their life cycle.  In most cases, the normal life cycle of one generation is four to six months.  In the Truckee River, regular macroinvertebrate surveys are used to determine conditions in the river. 

 

Materials: 

  1. Bottom samples from several locations along a stream or river.  Try to obtain samples both above and below sources of pollutants, such as the influx of water from Steamboat Creek to the Truckee River.
  2. White ice cube trays
  3. Labeling tape and waterproof markers for labeling trays
  4. Large shallow white trays or pans
  5. Small shallow white plastic or Styrofoam containers
  6. Tarp or other plastic sheet
  7. Tweezers, spatulas, white plastic spoons, small paintbrushes, clear plastic pipets, etc. for sorting bugs
  8. Hand lenses
  9. Disposable gloves
  10. Rinsing bucket
  11. Data sheet
  12. Macroinvertebrate keys
  13. Clipboard
  14. Pencils, colored and regular
  15. Graph paper

Procedure:  Students should formulate a hypothesis about which sampling site will have the best water quality, and which the worst.  Have them write out their hypothesis and reasoning prior to making the field trip or doing the survey.

 

  1. Gather stream bottom samples from several locations along a local stream or river where differences in sample composition due to water quality changes might be expected.  For example, collect samples (or request samples) from the Truckee River upstream of the confluence with Steamboat Creek, directly downstream of the confluence in Lockwood, and then at a location between Lockwood and Pyramid Lake such as Wadsworth.  For a sampling protocol, see p. 129, Streamkeeper's Field Guide, or the EPAs Streamside Biosurvey instructions on the web, www.epa.gov/OWOW/monitoring/volunteer/stream/vms42.html.  If it is unsafe to allow students to access the waterbody, ask agency staff to collect samples when they do their usual surveys. The samples will need to be preserved.
  2. Have students label the sections of the ice cube trays with the following major groups:

 Mayflies

Stoneflies

Caddisflies

Dobsonflies/alderflies/fishflies

Dragonflies/damselflies

True flies

Beetles

Crustaceans

Snails/clams

Worms/leeches

Other

  1. Spread out the entire contents of the sample container into a large, shallow white tray to make a thin layer of bugs.  Add just enough water to cover the sample.  If your sample is too large to spread into a thin layer, transfer part into a second tray.
  2. Fill the labeled ice cube trays with water.  Line them up end to end so the labeled edges face you.  Carefully sort out the debris, looking at each piece for benthic macroinvertebrates.  Some of the macroinvertebrates may blend extremely well into their habitat materials.  Use spatula, tweezers, spoons, and paintbrushes to sort the bugs into different sections of ice cube trays.  Use the white plastic containers to hold the bugs while you use a hand lens to examine and identify them.  Use the laminated identification cards to help you.  Look at the shape of the body and head, and the location, structure, and length of the gills, tails, eyes, mouthparts, antennae and prolegs.
  3. Record the numbers of macroinvertebrates on the macroinvertebrate survey worksheet.  Calculate water quality index value.  Is it excellent, good, fair, or poor?
  4. Collect equipment and clean up the site.
 

If you find:

Look for:

Little variety of insects, with lots of each kind

Water overly enriched with organic matter

Only one or two kinds of insects in great abundance

Severe organic pollution

A variety of insects, but only a few of each kind, or NO insects, but the stream appears clean

Toxic pollution

Macroinvertebrate Survey Worksheet

 

Stream_______________________________________________  Date__________________

 

Collection Site__________________________________________  State__________________

 

Macroinvertebrate Count

 

Sensitive:

 

o ____ caddisfly larvae

o ____ mayfly larvae

o ____ stonefly larvae

o ____ dobsonfly larvae (hellgrammite)

o ____ gilled snails

o ____ riffle beetle adult

o ____ water penny larvae

 

Boxes checked X 3 = ________ index value

 

Somewhat Sensitive:

 

o ____ beetle larvae

o ____ clams

o ____ crane fly larvae

o ____ crayfish

o ____ damselfly larvae

o ____ dragonfly larvae

o ____ scuds

o ____ sowbugs

o ____ fishflylarvae

o ____ alderfly larvae

o ____ watersnipe larvae

 

Boxes checked X 2 = ________ index value

 

Tolerant:

 

o ____ aquatic worms

o ____ black fly larvae

o ____ leeches

o ____ midge larvae

o ____ lunged snails

 

Boxes checked X 1 = ________ index value

Water Quality Rating: Total Index Value ____________

o Excellent (>22)                 o Fair (11-16)               

 

o Good (17-22)                   o Poor (<11) 

 

 



Practice Data Sheet

 

Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Sample

 

Sensitive:

 

o ____ caddisfly larvae

x_ 1_ mayfly larvae

x_ 1_ stonefly larvae

o ____ dobsonfly larvae (hellgrammite)

o ____ gilled snails

x__2_ riffle beetle adult

x __1_ water penny larvae

 

Boxes checked X 3 = _4 x 3 = 12_______ index value

 

Somewhat Sensitive:

 

o ____ beetle larvae

o ____ clams

o ____ crane fly larvae

o ____ crayfish

o ____ damselfly larvae

x __3_ dragonfly larvae

o ____ scuds

x__2_ sowbugs

o ____ fishflylarvae

o ____ alderfly larvae

o ____ watersnipe larvae

 

Boxes checked X 2 = 2 x 2 = 4_______ index value

 

Tolerant:

 

x __2_ aquatic worms

x__4_ black fly larvae

o ____ leeches

o ____ midge larvae

o ____ lunged snails

 

Boxes checked X 1 = _ 2 x 1 = 2_______ index value

Water Quality Rating: Total Index Value 12 +4 +2 = 18

o Excellent (>22)                 o Fair (11-16)               

 

x Good (17-22)                   o Poor (<11) 

 


Alternate Method to Assess Water Quality

 


Group 1:

Most Intolerant

Group 2:

Moderately Intolerant

Group 3:

Fairly Tolerant

Group 4:

Most Tolerant

o  Stonefly larva      

o  Caddisfly larva

o  Black fly larva

o  Aquatic worm

o  Alderfly larva       

o  Mayfly larva

o  Midge larva

o  Leech

o  Dobsonfly larva   

o  Riffle beetle larva

o  Sowbug

o  Left-hand/pouch snail

o  Snipefly larva      

o  Water penny adult

o  Right-hand/other snail

o  Bloodworm midge larva

 

o  Dragonfly nymph

o  Scud

 

 

o  Damselfly nymph

 

 

 

o  Cranefly larva

 

 

 

o  Crayfish

 

 

 

o  Clam/mussel

 

 

 

Totals and Weighting

 

Sample Summary

# of types in Group 1 =

# of types in Group 2 =

# of types in Group 3 =

# of types in Group 4 =

# of types x 1 =

# of types x 2 =

# of types x 3 =

# of types x 4 =

 

Sum of weighted scores = ____+____+____+____=____

 

Total number of different types = ____

 

Weighted average = sum of weighted scores divided by # of types = ____

 

 

 

Weighted Average

Water Quality

1.0 - 2.0

Excellent

2.1 - 2.5

Good

2.6 - 3.5

Fair

Over 3.6

Poor

 


Alternate Method (Sample Calculations)

 

Group 1:

Most Intolerant

Group 2:

Moderately Intolerant

Group 3:

Fairly Tolerant

Group 4:

Most Tolerant

x  Stonefly larva      

o  Caddisfly larva

x  Black fly larva

x  Aquatic worm

o  Alderfly larva       

x  Mayfly larva

o  Midge larva

o  Leech

o  Dobsonfly larva   

x  Riffle beetle larva

x  Sowbug

o  Left-hand/pouch snail

o  Snipefly larva      

x  Water penny adult

o  Right-hand/other snail

o  Bloodworm midge larva

 

x  Dragonfly nymph

o  Scud

 

 

o  Damselfly nymph

 

 

 

o  Cranefly larva

 

 

 

o  Crayfish

 

 

 

o  Clam/mussel

 

 

 

Totals and Weighting

 

Sample Summary

# of types in Group 1 = 1

# of types in Group 2 = 4

# of types in Group 3 = 2

# of types in Group 4 = 1

# of types x 1 = 1

# of types x 2 = 8

# of types x 3 = 6

# of types x 4 = 4

 

Sum of weighted scores = 1 + 8 + 6 + 4 = 19

 

Total number of different types =   9

 

Weighted average = sum of weighted scores divided by # of types = 19/8 = 2.375

 

Good water quality

 

 

 

Weighted Average

Water Quality

1.0 - 2.0

Excellent

2.1 -2.5

Good

2.6 -3.5

Fair

Over 3.6

Poor


Analyze the Macroinvertebrate Results in the Classroom

 

  1. Use the alternate method to assess water quality.  Are the results different from that found using the survey worksheet?  Why might they be different?

 

 

  1. Draw a graph showing the relative numbers of sensitive, somewhat sensitive, and tolerant macroinvertebrates.  Include data from all sampling sites on the same graph.  You will need to share your data with other groups.
  2. Which sampling location has the best water quality rating?  _____________________________
  3. Which sampling location has the poorest water quality rating? ___________________________
  4. Why do you think the results varied from site to site?

 

 

  1. Was your hypothesis correct?

 

 

  1. What other information would you need to collect to confirm your results? 

 

 

  1. What can be done to improve or protect the water quality in the Truckee River and its tributaries?

Resources

Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Identification Key, web-based interactive key, http://www.people.virginia.edu/~sos-iwla/Stream-Study/Key/Key1.HTML

A Community Water Quality Monitoring Manual for Waterwatch Victoria, web resource, www.vic.waterwatch.org.au/fortheteacher/manual/index.htm (see section on macroinvertebrates under "Biological Surveys"

Field Guide to Aquatic Macroinvertebrates, 2003, Izaak Walton League, www.iwla.org

Lippy, K., Friesem, J., Vanderburg, S., Usher, L., and Lynn, B, 1995, Discover Wetlands, A Curriculum Guide.  Washington State Department of Ecology, Publication #88-16-a, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/8816a.pdf

Monitor's Guide to Aquatic Macroinvertebrates, 1992, Loren Larkin Kellog, The Izaak Walton League of America, www.iwla.org